President Trump pointed to “pollsters” who say the government shutdown — combined with the fact that his name wasn’t on Tuesday’s ballot — were key reasons behind the Republican losses on Election Day.
“‘TRUMP WASN’T ON THE BALLOT, AND SHUTDOWN, WERE THE TWO REASONS THAT REPUBLICANS LOST ELECTIONS TONIGHT, according to Pollsters,” Trump posted on Truth Social on Tuesday night.
Republicans lost major races on Tuesday, though the vast majority of them were in deep blue states and districts.
In New York City, socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani defeated a rare bipartisan coalition that had rallied behind former Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) to win the mayor’s race.
Out west, California voters approved Proposition 50, effectively dismantling the state’s two-decade-old independent redistricting system. The measure clears the way for a new congressional map that could hand Democrats as many as five additional House seats in the 2026 midterm elections.
“It was not expected to be a victory. I don’t think it was good for Republicans. I’m not sure it was good for anybody, but we had an interesting evening, and we learned a lot,” Trump said at a Wednesday morning breakfast with GOP senators.
In New Jersey, a race that many expected to be close turned into a decisive win for Democrat Mikie Sherrill, who defeated Republican Jack Ciattarelli by a double-digit margin — 56.2% to 43.2% — with 95% of ballots counted as of Wednesday morning.
In Virginia, Democrat Abigail Spanberger also scored a commanding victory, defeating Republican Winsome Earle-Sears by more than 15 points, 57.5% to 42.3%, with 96% of votes tallied.
For comparison, former President Donald Trump lost both states in the previous year’s election — by 5.7 points in Virginia and 5.9 points in New Jersey, the Washington Times reported.
House Republicans are exploring legal and constitutional strategies to block Mamdani from being sworn into office, citing the Constitution’s post–Civil War “insurrection clause.”
The effort, first reported by the New York Post, is being led in part by the New York Young Republican Club, which argues that Mamdani’s past statements calling to “resist ICE” and his ties to left-wing organizations could qualify as “giving aid or comfort to the enemies” of the United States — language drawn directly from Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
That provision, enacted in 1868, bars from public office any person who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the United States, or who has provided “aid or comfort” to its enemies.
The clause was originally intended to prevent former Confederate officials from holding office but has recently re-emerged in political debates over ballot eligibility.
“There is a real and legitimate push to see the insurrectionist Zohran Mamdani either a) removed from the ballot or b) removed from office if he is to win on Tuesday,” said Stefano Forte, president of the New York Young Republican Club.
Several House Republicans are said to be reviewing whether the clause could be enforced through new legislation or congressional action following the election.
The idea mirrors the legal arguments used in Colorado last year to try to disqualify Trump from the state’s ballot — a move the Supreme Court ultimately overturned, ruling that Congress, not individual states, has the constitutional authority to enforce Section 3.
The Court’s decision has emboldened some GOP lawmakers who believe the ruling effectively places responsibility for such enforcement in the hands of Congress, where Republicans currently hold a narrow 219–213 majority in the House.
According to two congressional aides, Republican leaders may consider holding a post-election vote to declare Mamdani ineligible for office under the clause. Such a measure would face significant procedural and legal hurdles, including a likely filibuster in the Democrat-controlled Senate and near-certain court challenges.
The halls of Congress were already awake long before the sunrise.
Under the harsh glare of fluorescent lights, staffers shuffled between marble corridors clutching binders, coffee cups, and exhaustion. The air inside the Capitol carried that particular weight that only comes before a historic vote — the kind of vote that divides families, shifts economies, and defines presidencies.
Somewhere, deep in those corridors, an unexpected voice stirred the debate again.
It wasn’t a senator, or a freshman congressman trying to make a name.
It was someone who once
And he had a message — not for lawmakers, but for the people.
Just after midnight, former President Barack Obama
On X, the man who once campaigned on hope and unity posted a sharply worded call to action:
“More than 16 million Americans are at risk of losing their health care because Republicans in Congress are rushing to pass a bill that would cut federal funding for Medicaid and weaken the Affordable Care Act.
If the House passes this bill, it will increase costs and hurt working class families for generations to come.
Call your representative today and tell them to vote no on this bill.”
The message, direct and urgent, spread like wildfire across social media. Within hours, hashtags began trending: #StopTheBBB, #ProtectMedicaid, #VoteNoTrumpBill.
For Democrats, it was a rallying cry.
For Republicans, it was a declaration of war.
The legislation at the heart of the storm — dubbed by President Donald Trump as his “Big, Beautiful Bill” — had already become one of the most polarizing measures in modern U.S. politics.
Valued at $3.3 trillion, the massive package combines sweeping tax cuts, infrastructure spending, and social program rollbacks.
Supporters say it’s the blueprint for “America’s financial revival.”
Critics call it “the most aggressive dismantling of the welfare state in half a century.”
Inside the House chamber, tempers were flaring.
It was past 5 a.m. when House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries — Obama’s political heir in many ways — took to the floor with a stack of thick binders and a determined look.
He had only one weapon at his disposal: time.
Jeffries invoked a rare procedural privilege known as the “magic minute” — a rule that allows party leaders to speak for as long as they wish.
For hours, he read line by line, page by page, breaking down provisions, costs, and hidden clauses.
According to reporters, he spoke for nearly three hours straight, his voice steady, measured, and unrelenting.
When aides whispered that the bill was still likely to pass, Jeffries simply reached for another binder.
“This isn’t just a bill,” he said, his tone echoing through the chamber. “It’s a dismantling of the American promise.”
Behind him, some Democrats applauded. Others wiped tears from fatigue.
Across the aisle, Republican lawmakers rolled their eyes and whispered into phones.
As dawn broke, the vote still hung in limbo.
The House had narrowly advanced the debate in a 219–213 rule vote, setting up the final decision — but only after Jeffries finished speaking.
Several Republicans had briefly considered joining Democrats in protest.
Five had even threatened to sabotage the bill by abstaining.
Meanwhile, members of the Freedom Caucus — the fiery, populist bloc that helped restore Trump to power — found themselves torn. They supported Trump’s agenda but opposed what they called “hidden concessions” in the compromise.
“We didn’t come here to fund bureaucracy,” one Freedom Caucus member told Fox News Digital. “We came here to fix it.”
The House floor was a powder keg.
Every camera lens, every microphone, and every headline circled back to the same two figures — Trump and Obama, two men separated by ideology but bound by history, facing off again through their loyalists.
For years, Obama had kept his distance from day-to-day politics, occasionally appearing at college commencements or climate summits.
But this time, the former president’s words landed like a thunderclap.
To Democrats, it was the return of a general.
To Republicans, it was the intrusion of a ghost from the past.
“Obama is trying to stay relevant,” one GOP strategist told Politico. “He’s trying to be the conscience of a party that’s running out of voices.”
Still, the effect was immediate. Congressional offices reported thousands of phone calls from constituents — many reading Obama’s post word-for-word.
For the first time in months, Democrats believed they could at least slow Trump’s legislative juggernaut.
Inside the West Wing, however, Trump was undeterred.
According to aides, the president spent the early hours of Thursday morning pacing the Oval Office, speaking to advisors and calling House leaders.
Shortly after sunrise, he fired off his own message on Truth Social:
“It is no longer a House Bill or a Senate Bill — it is EVERYONE’S BILL.
There is so much to be proud of, and EVERYONE got a major Policy WIN — But the Biggest Winner of them all will be the AMERICAN PEOPLE, who will have Permanently Lower Taxes, Higher Wages, Secure Borders, and a Stronger and More Powerful Military.
We can have all of this right now — but only if the House GOP UNITES. Ignore the GRANDSTANDERS (you know who you are). Get it DONE before your July 4th vacation. The American People need and deserve it.”
The post instantly went viral among his supporters, many of whom flooded comment sections with hashtags like #PassTheBillNow and #TrumpDeliversAgain.
Behind the bravado, though, the stakes could not be higher.
The “Big, Beautiful Bill” represents the cornerstone of Trump’s second-term economic agenda — a plan his administration claims will deliver “historic tax reform, job creation, and national renewal.”
The proposal includes sweeping tax cuts for individuals and corporations, the restructuring of Medicaid funding, and billions in spending for defense and domestic manufacturing.
Republicans argue it’s a bold vision for prosperity. Democrats warn it’s an attack on the poor.
“Sixteen million Americans will lose healthcare,” Obama wrote. “Working families will bear the burden. That’s not reform — it’s regression.”
But for Trump, the measure is more than policy — it’s legacy.
He has repeatedly told aides that passing the bill will be “his signature moment” — the legislative equivalent of Reagan’s 1986 tax reforms.
“This bill,” Trump told supporters at a rally last week, “is the crown jewel of America’s comeback.”
As Thursday morning stretched on, Jeffries continued his marathon speech.
Reporters tweeted photos of lawmakers dozing on benches, lobbyists pacing hallways, and interns carrying boxes of energy drinks.
Still, the momentum was shifting.
Republican leaders had begun rounding up the last of their holdouts.
By mid-morning, whispers spread that Trump himself had called several GOP members personally — urging them to “make history.”
One lawmaker later described the call:
“He told me, ‘You don’t get remembered for hesitation. You get remembered for courage.’”
The final vote was imminent.
Watching from afar, Obama’s re-entry into the debate only intensified the drama.
Two presidents — one past, one present — battling for the soul of American policy.
For Trump, the bill symbolized economic rebirth.
For Obama, it represented moral decline.
Their words, separated by platforms but united in urgency, became the soundtrack of another defining chapter in U.S. politics.
Cable news split screens between Trump’s Truth Social posts and Obama’s tweet. Commentators called it “the rematch no one saw coming.”
By the time the House reconvened, the country was divided once again — not by borders or parties, but by belief.
Was this bill a restoration or a regression? A renewal or a rupture?
For millions of Americans, it felt personal.
Healthcare. Wages. Taxes.
Each vote in Congress would ripple through kitchen tables across the nation.
As one voter posted on social media:
“They fight in Washington, but we pay the price out here.”
In a last-minute speech before the vote, Speaker Mike Johnson urged unity.
“This is not a Republican bill or a Democratic bill,” Johnson said. “This is an American bill — one that strengthens families, rebuilds communities, and restores pride.”
Democrats booed.
Republicans stood and cheered.
Outside, hundreds of protesters gathered — some chanting “Pass the Bill,” others holding signs quoting Obama’s message: “Call. Vote. Resist.”
Whether the bill passes or fails, analysts agree it will define both men — the one in office and the one who once held it.
Obama’s late-night call to action re-ignited Democratic energy heading into the midterms, positioning him once again as the moral compass of his party.
Trump’s relentless push for passage, meanwhile, has cemented his image as a president who thrives on confrontation and refuses to retreat.
Two leaders.
Two visions.
One nation caught in the middle.
And as the gavel finally fell to signal the start of the vote, one truth became clear:
The battle over the “Big, Beautiful Bill” was never just about numbers or policy.
It was about who gets to define America’s future — and who will be remembered for shaping it.
No comments: